now what is your stance?
But the instant we start using terms like "Hypocrisy" and "Moral compass" then we are making an ethical comparison inasmuch as ethics is the formal language of morality.
I knew you would catch me out on that. Well done.
Just tell me you understand what I mean and that everything will be ok.
now what is your stance?
I'm not arguing for ethical equivalency. It's a moot point. What I am arguing for is the negligence in identifying the hypocrisy of a community that has shared illegal copies of CoC and WT copyrighted material for decades, now suddenly finding their moral compass and justifying a separation of compliance to law between two entities, one they support and one they do not. Seems clear to me. I am surprised by the obfuscation of so many participating.
now what is your stance?
now what is your stance?
now what is your stance?
Well lets take the KS10. Distributed in its entirety. Maybe it is just thrown on a website or Facebook group. People read it. They realize Watchtower is bat shit crazy and they pack their bags and leave. OR, there is a lengthy blog pinpointing all the bullshit from the KS10 that is posted in its entirety. Fair use right? Not so much. The entire book is posted in an effort to expose Watchtower by their own writings. It falls out of fair use because of extent of body of work posted AND changing its intended purpose. Of course WT is going to challenge it. And they have done so successfully not just with the KS10 but with an array of their other "copyrighted" material. The reason why so much of it still proliferates is because WT does not have the manpower to combat it. But many, even on this forum, will attest to Watchtower ripping their information off the internet because of copyright violations.
now what is your stance?
now what is your stance?
now what is your stance?
Called brilliant twice in one day. I'm blushing.
now what is your stance?
Orphan Crow said:
You have to establish copyright first. I am saying that their material doesn't meet the standard of what can be copyrighted.
Are you really asserting that everything Watchtower puts on paper is not copyrighted? Or is it not copyrighted to your level of acceptance?
now what is your stance?
